UPDATED: Documents Suggest More Stolen Idols At National Gallery Of Australia

UPDATE 4/10/14: Indian authorities have asked regional police and the public to help identify the origin of the two Dvarapalas that Kapoor sold to the NGA.

Last week we revealed documents suggesting the $5 million bronze Dancing Shiva purchased by the National Gallery of Australia in 2005  had been stolen from an Indian temple not long before.

Shiva Nataraja2The story made immediate waves. You can find media coverage of our scoop here and here. Jason has a story in the June 11th Los Angeles Times on the case. We’ve also shared info with Michaela Boland, the national arts writer at The Australian, who has published additional material there.

As promised, here’s information on four more objects the museum acquired from Subhash Kapoor, whose Manhattan gallery Art of the Past has been selling ancient art to museums around the world since 1974.

Two Dvarapalas, or Door Guardians

In 2005, the National Gallery of Australia purchased a pair of 15th century stone Dvarapalas from Kapoor for nearly $500,000.



Kapoor provided ownership records for the pair stating they were purchased by a New York collector in 1971 from a gallery in Calcutta .

Dwarapalas prov

Kapoor included what he claimed to be an original receipt from the gallery.

Dwarapalas receipt

Digital images sent to Kapoor, however, show the statues sitting on a dirt floor, propped up by a brick with a white cloth hanging behind them. Sources say the images were taken by Indian smugglers and sent to Kapoor via email in recent years.



Nagaraja, the Serpent King

In 2006, Kapoor sold the NGA an 8th century sandstone sculpture of Nagaraja, the Serpent King, for $337,500.

152673Nagaraja 2

An ownership document supplied by Kapoor states the Nagaraja had been in a Japanese private collection since 1969.

Nagaraja prov

But among Kapoor’s records are digital pictures of the sculpture suggesting it was still in India in 2005. They show what appears to be the same sculpture sitting on a dirt floor and plaid blanket (above right), and in a warehouse leaning up against burlap packing materials (below.)

Nagaraja 1

Monumental Alam

In 2008, the NGA acquired a 19th century monumental brass Alam, or Islamic processional standard, from Kapoor for $195,000.


The dealer provided a document claiming a diplomat from New York had purchased it in Delhi in the late 1960s.

Alam provDigital images allegedly sent to Kapoor by smugglers, however, suggest it was in India in 2006.



The National Galley of Australia has not responded to multiple requests for comment. Perhaps none is needed?

UPDATE 6/13: Prompted by “media reports,” the National Gallery of Australia has released a statement acknowledging, “it is possible that the Gallery is a victim of fraud.”

The NGA details the due diligence process it took before acquiring the statue of Shiva include:

∙ the receipt of a certificate from the international Art Loss Register

∙ receiving and checking letters from the previous owner, including checking that the address of the former owner was legitimate

∙ consulting the Tamil Nadu Police website for stolen objects

∙ liaising with a Chola bronze expert in India, who was supportive of the acquisition

∙ checking the extensive records produced by the Archaeological Survey of India.

The steps were clearly not sufficient to prevent the museum from repeatedly acquiring recently looted antiquities from Kapoor. They raise several questions: Does  an Art Loss Register certificate for unprovenanced antiquities carry any meaning? If not, as many experts say, why is it continued to be offered evidence of due diligence by auction houses, dealers and museums? Why did the museum merely confirm the address of the previous owner, not contact him? When the Tamil Nadu Idol Wing website posted an image of the stolen Shiva in 2009, months after the NGA acquired the statue, did the museum contact authorities or do anything proactive to determine if their statue had indeed been stolen? And who was the Chola bronze expert in India who was consulted?

The statement concludes: “At this point the Gallery has been given no substantiated evidence to affect its belief that it owns a genuine item with proper documentation for its history of ownership and which was acquired within accepted museums standards.” Really?

The Australian case holds lessons for all museums that acquire ancient art. The “well regarded” dealers you do business with may someday end up like Kapoor. When that happens, how will your due dilligence efforts look in hindsight. In particular, good faith museums in possession of purported ownership histories from Kapoor should be actively investigating the true provenance of those objects — and making the results public.


10 responses to “UPDATED: Documents Suggest More Stolen Idols At National Gallery Of Australia

  1. Bharat Museum

    For some reason, we cannot open some of your sites in India and do not know if anything can be done at your end.

    Thank you so much for chasing these terrible crimes. We really appreciate your work.

  2. Alexander gotz

    Sorry .. I pressed the wrong button …
    I continue with Kapoor …
    The import papers are not correct … and nobody is checking at the US side …under normal circumstances any shipment from India which contains art old or new will be searched .. why not Kapoor’s
    Maybe his good’s came from Belgium .. where import control is very relaxed in to the US .. US customs are aware of the lax attitude of their counter part in Belgium .. more reason to check any thing from there ..
    If you investigate … go in to this direction .. but maybe you don’t have the balls ???
    US CUSTOMS AND THE INTERNAL REVENUE ARE GOD .. With one difference … God you can not bribe !!!

  3. Pingback: Coming Clean: Australia’s Art Gallery of New South Wales Releases Kapoor Documents | CHASING APHRODITE

  4. Pingback: Lost and Found: Images Show Art Gallery NSW’s Sculpture Was Stolen From An Indian Temple | CHASING APHRODITE

  5. Pingback: Untold Millions: The National Gallery of Australia Won’t Say What They Paid Kapoor, So We Will: At least $8.5M | CHASING APHRODITE

  6. L’ha ribloggato su Pittura1arte2disegno3e ha commentato:
    WIKILOOT,caccia alle antichità saccheggiate nei Musei del Mondo in NETLOG+GOOGLE Blogs artistici: PATRIMONI Italiani e Mondiali UNESCO – MUSEI – MOSTRE ED EVENTI nell’Arte – TELE AD OLIO, su tela e tavola,clicca grazie: http://it.netlog.com/susannagalbarini

  7. Pingback: False Provenance: Indictment of Kapoor’s Girlfriend Reveals Fake Ownership Histories | CHASING APHRODITE

  8. Pingback: Unprecedented: Australia’s National Gallery Sues Kapoor Over $5 Million Stolen Shiva | CHASING APHRODITE

  9. Pingback: Radford Speaks: Director of Australia’s National Gallery Is In Denial | CHASING APHRODITE

  10. Pingback: The Crennan Report: The NGA’s Ex Post Facto Due Diligence Finds 22 “Questionable” Asian Antiquities | CHASING APHRODITE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s