UPDATE 2/15: The Hindu has revealed new evidence that the Shiva was stolen — a photograph of the bronze taken in situ some 30 years ago. Tamil Nadu police have confirmed the match, reports A. Srivathsan. Vijay Kumar has demonstrated previously that Shiva’s consort Uma was also stolen from the temple and is now in the custody of the US Government. As Kumar writes, “This should be more than adequate proof to seek the return of this bronze back to India and hopefully reunite the divine couple.”
UPDATE 2/14: I was interviewed by the Australian Broadcasting Corp. about the latest development in the Kapoor case. The National Gallery confirmed to the ABC that they have contacted the Indian government to “discuss avenues for restitution” for the statue, which it now admits was likely stolen. Here’s the story and the interview.
The National Gallery of Australia has filed a $5 million lawsuit against Manhattan antiquities dealer Subhash Kapoor alleging the dealer and his staff committed fraud when they sold the museum an 11th century bronze sculpture of Shiva that had been stolen from an Indian temple.
The lawsuit, filed on February 5th in New York’s Supreme Court, alleges Kapoor, his gallery and manager Aaron Freedman “fraudulently induced NGA to acquire the Shiva by making misrepresentations and false assurances concerning the history of the Shiva.” The museum states that as a result of evidence the statue was stolen, the Shiva “now has, at best, clouded title and diminished or no financial and other value.”
We first revealed last June that the NGA’s Shiva had been stolen from the Sivan Temple in Tamil Nadu temple. Our post included this photo – sent to Kapoor by an alleged smuggler in 2006 – showing the Shiva soon after it was stolen. We published a copy of the search certificate Kapoor obtained from the Art Loss Register, and linked to the Tamil Nadu Idol Wing, which detailed its investigation of the Shiva’s theft in 2006.
The NGA’s response at the time: “there is yet to emerge any conclusive evidence.” In its complaint filed last week, the NGA states that a “concrete development” only took place in December, when Aaron Freedman, Kapoor’s gallery manager (above), pled guilty to six criminal counts, including forging provenance.
The NGA lawsuit, to our knowledge, is unprecedented. American museums and private collectors have returned hundreds of looted objects to Italy, Greece, Turkey, India, Cambodia and other countries in recent years. In nearly all those cases, dealers had provided standard warranties guaranteeing good title to the objects. And yet not one museum or collector had filed a similar lawsuit…that we know of.
Why not? For one thing, it will likely be difficult to collector from Kapoor, who is facing criminal trial in Indian and an arrest warrant in the United States. Perhaps more importantly, such a lawsuit could expose claimants to extensive discovery about their due diligence and possible counter-claims from dealers that the buyers knew full well the objects being purchased had been looted. Awkward.
If Kapoor defends the NGA lawsuit, the Australian museum could face these awkward questions. We know, for example, that NGA Director Ron Radford (left) personally met with Kapoor in his New York gallery. Might we hear Freedman or Kapoor’s version of what exactly Radford knew at the time?
The NGA attempts to forestall this argument by detailing – for the first time – the due diligence it conducted before buying the Shiva. The museum:
- Obtained a search certificate from the Art Loss Register. [We’ve explained here why the ALR is virtually useless for antiquities.]
- Confirmed the address of a previous owner who reported lived in Washington DC [But didn’t, apparently, contact that person.]
- Consulted the Tamil Nadu Idol Police website [But didn’t, apparently, contacting the police themselves. The site did not post information about the theft until it was discovered in 2008. Did the NGA never check again?]
- Checked Indian archaeological records and an Indian expert. [Whom they haven’t named.]
- Relied on other documents and guarantees provided by Kapoor. [Which we now know were forged.]
Needless to say, this sounds an awful lot like optical due diligence.
The Shiva lawsuit may be the first of several from the NGA. The museum acknowledges it purchased 21 other objects from Kapoor’s gallery between 2002 and 2011, and we’ve detailed similar damning photos and forged ownership histories for objects valued at nearly $10 million. The museum notes, “further work will need to be undertaken by the NGA to ensure clear title and accurate provenance of those works.”
Meanwhile, Kapoor’s criminal trial in India, which was due to begin this week, has been delayed until February 21. It will likely reveal additional details about these and other objects.
Here are copies of the NGA lawsuit and Exhibits:
cant imagine anything worse than an indian prison, but since hes rich i imagine he gets special treatment.
Pingback: New York Lawsuit shows due diligence pays, as much as $5m | Illicit Cultural Property
Let us start a petition to repatriate those stolen cultural treasures:
Dear Mr. Radford,
Many of us are aware of the fact that a number of museums and galleries purchase and exhibit stolen arts. It appears that Australian National gallery is one such entity. I would like to draw your attention to this article published by Chasing Aphrodite: https://chasingaphrodite.com/2014/02/11/unprecedented-australias-national-gallery-sues-kapoor-over-5-million-stolen-shiva/
If the article is true as it appears so, we hope that you would take immediate steps to repatriate those stolen arts that you obtained from Mr. Kapoor (and or anyone else) back to India where they rightfully belong. Not doing so would involve ANG as a party to plundering of cultural treasures from another country. It is not right and returning those priceless artifacts will be the right thing to do.
We hope that you will consider this and take steps to correct such mis-deeds by someone like Mr. Kapoor as soon as possible. This will enhance the reputation of ANG tremendously.
Pingback: Radford Speaks: Director of Australia’s National Gallery Is In Denial | CHASING APHRODITE
Pingback: Reckless: In Pursuit of Shiva, the National Gallery of Australia Ignored the Advice of Its Attorney | CHASING APHRODITE
Pingback: UPDATED > Singapore Sling: The Asian Civilizations Museum Paid Kapoor More Than $1 million | CHASING APHRODITE